Latest ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test Questions Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!
Pass PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam in First Attempt Easily
NEW QUESTION # 28
Put the following steps of a third-party audit into the correct sequence in which they happen.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Sequence:
Stage 1 Audit
Stage 2 Opening Meeting
Interviews
Stage 2 Closing Meeting
Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings
Issue Certificate
Surveillance Audit
Follow-up Audit
To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.
Here is a brief explanation of each step:
Stage 1 Audit: This is the initial audit that aims to assess the readiness of the organization for the stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documentation of the quality management system, evaluating the scope and objectives of the audit, and identifying any major gaps or nonconformities34.
Stage 2 Opening Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the start of the stage 2 audit. It involves confirming the audit plan, the audit criteria, the audit scope, and the audit team. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to ask any questions or raise any concerns34.
Interviews: This is the main activity of the stage 2 audit, where the audit team collects evidence by interviewing the personnel involved in the quality management system, observing the processes and activities, and examining the records and documents. The audit team uses various techniques, such as sampling, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system345.
Stage 2 Closing Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the end of the stage 2 audit. It involves presenting the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit report to the auditee. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to provide feedback, ask questions, or dispute any findings34.
Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings: This is the process of verifying that the auditee has taken appropriate corrective actions to address any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during the stage 2 audit. The audit team may request evidence or conduct a follow-up visit to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions34.
Issue Certificate: This is the process of issuing a certificate of conformity to the auditee, if the audit team is satisfied that the quality management system meets the requirements of the standard and that there are no major nonconformities or unresolved issues. The certificate is valid for a specified period, usually three years, and is subject to periodic surveillance audits34.
Surveillance Audit: This is the process of conducting periodic audits, usually once a year, to monitor the continued conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system. It involves reviewing the changes, improvements, and performance of the quality management system, and identifying any new nonconformities or opportunities for improvement34.
Follow-up Audit: This is the process of conducting an additional audit, usually in response to a significant change, a complaint, or a major nonconformity, to verify the impact and the corrective actions taken by the auditee. It may result in the suspension, withdrawal, or renewal of the certificate, depending on the outcome of the audit34.
NEW QUESTION # 29
Which two of the following auditors would not participate in a first-party audit?
- A. An auditor trained in the IRCA scheme
- B. An auditor trained in-house
- C. An auditor employed by an external consultancy organisation
- D. An auditor from a customer
- E. An auditor certified by IRCA
- F. An auditor from an interested party
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
A first-party audit is an internal audit conducted by auditors who are employed by the organization being audited but who have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited1. The purpose of a first-party audit is to assess the conformity of the organization's quality management system to the requirements of ISO 9001 and to identify opportunities for improvement2. Therefore, the two auditors who would not participate in a first-party audit are:
*A. An auditor employed by an external consultancy organization: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a customer or supplier of the organization being audited) or a third-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a certification body or registrar).
*F. An auditor from a customer: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit, as a customer is an interested party that has specific requirements for the organization being audited.
The other options are not correct, as they could participate in a first-party audit, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited:
*B. An auditor from an interested party: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as the interested party is within the organization being audited. For example, an auditor from the finance department could audit the production department, as long as they are not involved in the production process or affected by its outcomes.
*C. An auditor trained in-house: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The source of the auditor's training is not relevant for determining the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.
*D. An auditor trained in the IRCA scheme: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The IRCA scheme is a professional certification scheme for auditors of management systems, which provides recognition of the auditor's competence and credibility3. However, being trained in the IRCA scheme does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.
*E. An auditor certified by IRCA: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. Being certified by IRCA means that the auditor has met the requirements of the IRCA scheme and has demonstrated their competence and credibility as an auditor of management systems3. However, being certified by IRCA does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.
References: First Party Audits: The 5 Steps to Success - Sync Resource Inc, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group, IRCA - International Register of Certificated Auditors
NEW QUESTION # 30
You are conducting a third-party Stage 1 audit at ABC Ltd, a single-site organisation that manufactures wooden furniture. You interview the Technical Director to learn more about the organisation. The Technical Director explains that they have had a successful year and that obtaining ISO 9001 certification will support the further growth of the business. You ask for an overview of the organisation's structure and its interrelationships with external interested parties.
The Technical Director shows you a document detailing all business processes and interrelationships. You notice in this document that another organisation called Teak Ltd manufactures wooden furniture on behalf of ABC Ltd. The Technical Director confirms this capability has been accounted for in the scope of the quality management system. You learn that the furniture manufactured by Teak Ltd has accounted for 40% of the sales revenue over the previous 12 months.
Which two of the following options best describe how you would plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd?
- A. Verify how ABC Ltd evaluates the performance of Teak Ltd
- B. Verify the controls concerning customer property implemented by Teak Ltd
- C. Verify the quality management system at Teak Ltd by conducting an audit at their site
- D. Verify Teak Ltd supply arrangements as described in the ABC Ltd quality management system
- E. Verify whether the design processes of Teak Ltd comply with ISO 9001
- F. Verify if Teak Ltd are certified to ISO 9001
Answer: A,D
Explanation:
According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4, an organization is required to control the processes, products and services provided by external providers, including those that affect the quality of the organization's own products and services. This includes determining the controls to be applied to the external provision of processes, products and services, as well as the information to be communicated to the external providers. The organization is also required to monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of the external providers and retain documented information of these activities.
Therefore, in the scenario given, ABC Ltd is responsible for controlling the processes, products and services provided by Teak Ltd, as they affect the quality of ABC Ltd's own products and services. This means that ABC Ltd should have established criteria and methods for evaluating the performance of Teak Ltd, as well as documented information of the results of such evaluation. ABC Ltd should also have defined the supply arrangements with Teak Ltd, including the specifications, requirements, and verification activities related to the products and services provided by Teak Ltd.
Hence, the best options to describe how to plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd are A and D, as they are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4.
The other options are either irrelevant or beyond the scope of the audit, as they do not pertain to the control of external provision by ABC Ltd.
References:
ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems - Requirements, clause 8.4 ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.3.1 and 6.4.2 ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section "Learning objectives" ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6
NEW QUESTION # 31
You are conducting a third-party audit to ISO 9001 and the next item on your audit plan is 'internal auditing'.
When reviewing a sample of audit records up to 5 years previously, you find that many contain non-conformance reports and no actions have been taken. You interview the Quality Manager.
You: "I have noted that many of the older files contain non-conformances that have not had any corrective action taken." Quality Manager: "Because the business is always changing, the departmental managers tell me that the non-conformances are no longer applicable. I made a decision that any non-conformance over 3 years old is automatically closed" You: "Do you obtain any confirmation beforehand from the appropriate departments that the non-conformances are no longer applicable." Quality Manager: " No, because they are so old I consider that they are no longer appropriate. Please remember that we take a risk-based approach which means we audit where and when it is considered important to do so.
Select one course of action you would now take from the options.
- A. Raise a non-conformance report against clause 9.2.2.e of ISO 9001
- B. Review all non-conformances reports related to clause 9.2 of ISO 9001
- C. Interview relevant Departmental managers to assess whether the older non-conformances are still valid.
- D. Interview Top management to determine whether they were aware of and agreed the actions of the Quality Manager
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.2.2.e, the organization is required to retain documented information as evidence of the implementation of the audit programme and the audit results. This includes the records of the nonconformities identified during the internal audits and the corrective actions taken to address them. The organization is also required to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions, as per clause 10.2.2.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the Quality Manager's decision to automatically close any nonconformance over 3 years old without obtaining any confirmation from the relevant departments or verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions is a clear violation of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.e. This indicates a lack of control and follow-up of the internal audit process, as well as a potential risk of recurrence or occurrence of the nonconformities in other areas. This also undermines the credibility and value of the internal audit programme, as well as the risk-based approach claimed by the Quality Manager.
Hence, the best course of action to take is D, to raise a nonconformance report against clause 9.2.2.e of ISO
9001, and to communicate the audit findings to the relevant management. The other options are either insufficient or irrelevant to address the issue, as they do not directly relate to the noncompliance with clause
9.2.2.e.
References:
ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems - Requirements, clause 9.2.2 and 10.2.2 ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.4 and 6.7.2 ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section "Learning objectives" ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6
NEW QUESTION # 32
Select the term which best describes the quality management system process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria.
- A. Corrective action
- B. Correction
- C. Preventive action
- D. Concession
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary, correction is defined as "action to eliminate a detected nonconformity". A nonconformity is defined as "non-fulfilment of a requirement". Therefore, the process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria is a correction, as it eliminates the non-fulfilment of the product specification. The other options are not correct, as they have different definitions and purposes:
*Concession: permission to release or use a nonconforming product, service or process
*Corrective action: action to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent recurrence
*Preventive action: action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other undesirable potential situation References: ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary, ISO 9001 nonconforming product: How to understand dispositions - Advisera
NEW QUESTION # 33
In the context of a management system audit, identify the sequence of a typical process for collecting and verifying information. The first one has been done for you.
To complete the sequence click on the blank section you want to complete so it is highlighted in red and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Identifying the source of information
Sampling available data
Gathering audit evidence
Verifying objective evidence
Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria
Making audit conclusions
Evaluating against the audit criteria
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4, the process of collecting and verifying information during an audit involves the following steps1:
Identifying the source of information: The audit team should identify the sources of information that are relevant to the audit objectives, scope and criteria. These sources may include documents, records, personnel, processes, activities, facilities, equipment, etc. The audit team should also determine the methods and tools for accessing and collecting the information, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc.
Sampling available data: The audit team should select a representative sample of the available data to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the management system. The sample size and selection method should be based on the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the level of confidence and risk. The audit team should also consider the validity, reliability, relevance and sufficiency of the data.
Gathering audit evidence: The audit team should use the methods and tools identified in the previous step to collect audit evidence, which is the records, statements of fact or other information that are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable. The audit team should record the audit evidence in a clear, concise and objective manner, using notes, checklists, photographs, audio or video recordings, etc.
Verifying objective evidence: The audit team should verify the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the audit evidence collected. This may involve cross-checking different sources of information, confirming the identity and authority of the persons providing the information, examining the original documents or records, etc. The audit team should also identify any discrepancies, inconsistencies or gaps in the audit evidence.
Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria: The audit team should compare the audit evidence with the audit criteria to determine the extent of conformity and nonconformity. The audit team should also identify any opportunities for improvement, best practices, positive aspects or potential risks. The audit team should use professional judgement and apply the principles of auditing when evaluating the audit evidence.
Making audit conclusions: The audit team should consolidate the audit findings and evaluate the overall performance and effectiveness of the management system. The audit team should also consider the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the context and expectations of the auditee and other interested parties. The audit team should provide a clear, concise and objective statement of the audit conclusions, which may include the degree of conformity, the achievement of the intended outcomes, the need for corrective actions, the suitability for certification, etc.
Evaluating against the audit criteria: The audit team should review the audit conclusions and ensure that they are consistent with the audit criteria and supported by sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.
The audit team should also ensure that the audit conclusions are communicated to the auditee and other relevant parties in a timely and effective manner, using the agreed audit report format and distribution method.
References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 34
You are carrying out an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time.
The organisation manufactures
cosmetics for major retailers.
You are interviewing the Manufacturing Manager (MM).
You: "I would like to begin by looking at the cleaning controls."
MM: "We record the cleaning of the equipment at the end of every batch. This document details the minimum cleaning frequency and the procedures to follow for all areas and each item of equipment. The person who carries out the cleaning puts their initial on the document and records the time and date alongside." Narrative: You sample production records over 3-days and note down evidence of nonconformity as per the table below.
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 35
The following are stages of an audit, put them in the order they would be conducted.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Establishing the audit programme objectives
Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities
Establishing the audit programme
Initiating the audit
Preparing all audit activity
Conducting the audit activities
To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.
Here is a brief explanation of each stage:
Establishing the audit programme objectives: This is the first stage of the audit process, where the purpose, scope, and criteria of the audit programme are defined. The audit programme objectives should be aligned with the strategic direction and policies of the organization, and should address the needs and expectations of the interested parties12.
Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities: This is the second stage of the audit process, where the factors that can affect the achievement of the audit programme objectives are identified and assessed. The audit programme risks and opportunities should consider the internal and external issues, the requirements and changes of the interested parties, and the results and feedback from previous audits12.
Establishing the audit programme: This is the third stage of the audit process, where the audit programme is designed and implemented. The audit programme should include the audit programme procedures, the audit programme resources, the audit methods and techniques, the audit frequency and schedule, and the audit programme performance indicators12.
Initiating the audit: This is the fourth stage of the audit process, where the audit is prepared and planned. The audit initiation involves selecting the audit team, establishing the contact with the auditee, defining the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, developing the audit plan, and conducting the document review123.
Preparing all audit activity: This is the fifth stage of the audit process, where the audit activities are organized and coordinated. The audit preparation involves assigning the audit tasks, communicating with the auditee and the audit team, arranging the logistics, preparing the working documents, and conducting the opening meeting123.
Conducting the audit activities: This is the sixth and final stage of the audit process, where the audit evidence is collected and evaluated. The audit conduct involves performing the audit activities, such as interviews, observations, document reviews, and tests, documenting the audit findings, preparing the audit conclusions, and conducting the closing meeting123.
I hope this helps you with your ISO 9001 Lead Auditor objectives and content. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask.
References: 1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems 2: Audit Process | Flowchart | Summary - Accountinguide 3: What are the Stages of the Auditing Process & Why it is Important ...
NEW QUESTION # 36
During a second-party audit, the auditor examines the records that are available for the external provider, ABC Forgings, to whom manufacturing has recently been outsourced.
There are standard external provider checklists for three competitors for the contract and there are inspection records from the trial manufacturing batches produced by ABC Forgings. There is no documented evidence of the criteria used to confirm the appointment of ABC Forgings, and no contract or terms and conditions.
Ongoing monitoring indicates that external provider performance is satisfactory, but no documented information has been retained.
Select two options for the evidence which demonstrates a nonconformity with clause 8.4 of ISO 9001.
- A. The auditee trusted the external provider because of a long-standing relationship with them.
- B. The auditee required the outsourced products on an urgent basis before the completion of the paperwork.
- C. There were no receipt inspection records of the incoming materials.
- D. There was no documentation which provided evidence of any monitoring of the external provider.
- E. The auditee did not retain documentation on the selection and evaluation of the external provider.
- F. The external provider asked for the contract details to be verbal only.
Answer: D,E
Explanation:
According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:
*Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently.
*Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed.
*Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements.
The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization's needs. The selection should be documented and approved.
*Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely.
*Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods.
The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed.
In this case, the evidence statements that demonstrate a nonconformity with clause 8.4 are A and C, because they show that the organization did not retain documented information of the selection and evaluation of the external provider, and the monitoring of the external provider's performance. These are requirements of the standard and essential for ensuring the quality of the externally provided processes, products, and services.
The other options are not directly related to clause 8.4, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization's QMS. For example, option B may relate to clause 7.1.3 on contingency planning, option D may relate to clause 8.2.3 on review of requirements, option E may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option F may relate to clause 5.1.1 on leadership and commitment.
References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Scope], Mastering the Scope of ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems
NEW QUESTION # 37
Select the word that best completes the sentence:
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
According to the ISO - Management system standards page, the key benefits of an effective management system include improved operational effectiveness and efficiency, improved risk management and protection of people and the environment, and enhanced drive for innovation. The Integrated Use of Management System Standards (IUMSS) handbook also states that the purpose and objectives of management system standards are to help organizations improve their performance by specifying repeatable steps that organizations consciously implement to achieve their goals and objectives.
Therefore, the complete sentence is:
"The purpose of a management system standard is to improve the performance of an organisation."
NEW QUESTION # 38
Match each of the following statements into the table below to show whether they apply to first-party audits, second-party audits or third-party audits:
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Table
Statement
First-party audits
Second-party audits
Third-party audits
The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.
Yes
No
No
The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.
No
No
Yes
The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.
No
Yes
No
Here is a brief explanation of each statement:
The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.
The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.
The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.
NEW QUESTION # 39
Which two of the following aspects of a quality management system must the organisation continually improve?
- A. Responsiveness
- B. Effectiveness
- C. Adaptability
- D. Efficiency
- E. Suitability
- F. Applicability
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
According to the ISO 9001:2015 document, the organisation must continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the quality management system1. However, among the six options given, only effectiveness is directly mentioned as an aspect of the quality management system that must be continually improved. Therefore, C is one of the correct answers.
Efficiency, on the other hand, is not explicitly stated as an aspect of the quality management system that must be continually improved, but it is implied by the quality management principle of improvement, which states that successful organisations have an ongoing focus on improvement2. One of the key benefits of applying this principle is improving operational effectiveness and efficiency2. Therefore, E is another correct answer.
Suitability, adaptability, responsiveness, and applicability are not aspects of the quality management system that must be continually improved, according to the ISO 9001:2015 document. They may be related to the quality management system, but they are not the focus of continual improvement.
Therefore, the correct answer is C and E.
References: 1: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems - Requirements 2: ISO - Quality management principles
NEW QUESTION # 40
You have been nominated audit team leader of a third-party audit. Which of the following could be the two most relevant objectives of this audit?
- A. Identify opportunities for improvement
- B. Evaluate the benefits obtained since the implementation of the management system
- C. Evaluate the capability of the management system to establish and achieve objectives
- D. Evaluate the satisfaction interested parties
- E. Identify the need of resources
- F. Evaluate the effectiveness of the management system
Answer: C,F
Explanation:
Evaluate the effectiveness of the management system: This objective involves verifying that the quality management system meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001:2015, and that it achieves the intended results and outcomes. The audit team will collect and analyse audit evidence to determine the degree of conformity and performance of the quality management system23.
*Evaluate the capability of the management system to establish and achieve objectives: This objective involves verifying that the quality management system supports the strategic direction and policies of the organization, and that it addresses the needs and expectations of the interested parties. The audit team will assess the suitability, adequacy, and alignment of the quality management system objectives, and the effectiveness of the planning and implementation processes to achieve them23.
The other options are not the most relevant objectives of a third-party audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other aspects or types of audits, but they are not the focus of a third-party audit.
Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.
References: 1: Safeguarding Your Business: The Power of Third-Party Security Audits 2: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems 3: Third Party Audit - QMSGurus.com
NEW QUESTION # 41
Match the process descriptions below to the process names:
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
A white background with black text Description automatically generated
NEW QUESTION # 42
You are conducting an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time.
The organisation manufactures cosmetics for major retailers and the name of the retailer supplied appears on the product packaging. Sales turnover has increased significantly over the past five years You are interviewing the new Product Development Manager. You note that a software application called SWIFT is used to help control the product development process.
You have gathered audit evidence as outlined in the table. Match the ISO 9001 clause 8.3 extracts to the audit evidence.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
The table below shows the possible matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 extract to the audit evidence.
Table
Audit evidence
ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 extract
Half of all new products launched in the past 12 months were late. The NPD Manager explains he has not got enough people on his team to cope with the demand for new products.
"8.3.2 e) ... internal ... resource needs for the design and development of products ..." The NPD Manager explains many changes are made to cosmetic formulations during product development owing to retailer feedback. Only when confirmed by the retailer is the agreed formulation documented on SWIFT.
"8.3.5 ... retain documented information ..."
The NPD Manager explains that the customer confirms their approval to proceed with a new formulation by email. These emails are kept on SWIFT.
"8.3.6 ... retain documented information ..."
The NPD Manager shows you evidence of consumer trials that are carried out for some new products prior to full-scale launch.
"8.3.4 d) ... conducted to ensure that the resulting products and services meet the requirements ..." The NPD Manager explains that an approved external laboratory is used to perform shelf-life stability trials on some formulations during product development.
"8.3.2 e) ... external ... resource needs for the design and development of products ..."
NEW QUESTION # 43
......
We offers you the latest free online ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor dumps to practice: https://www.premiumvcedump.com/PECB/valid-ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor-premium-vce-exam-dumps.html
The Most Efficient ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Pdf Dumps For Assured Success : https://drive.google.com/open?id=11CaNs_ST41E0OjLjv759a0CBpeCXjM2B