Check Real VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Question for Free (2025)
Get Ready to Boost your Prepare for your 2V0-13.24 Exam with 115 Questions
NEW QUESTION # 69
When designing for scalability in VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF), which of the following decisions supports scaling a VCF solution?
Response:
- A. Using a single vCenter Server for all clusters to centralize management
- B. Deploying all workloads on a single availability zone for simplicity
- C. Limiting the number of virtual machines to avoid overload
- D. Ensuring the vSAN storage configuration supports horizontal scaling
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 70
Which of the following should be part of the logical design when creating a VMware Cloud Foundation Workload Domain?
Response:
- A. The configuration of storage devices for the domain
- B. The expected workload types and their resource consumption
- C. The placement of physical network equipment in the data center
- D. The specific models of ESXi hosts used in the domain
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 71
Which statement defines the purpose of Business Requirements?
- A. Business requirements define how the goals and objectives can be achieved.
- B. Business requirements define which audience needs to be involved.
- C. Business requirements define which goals and objectives can be achieved.
- D. Business requirements define what goals and objectives need to be achieved.
Answer: D
Explanation:
In the context of VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 and IT architecture design,business requirements articulate the high-level needs and expectations of the organization that the solution must address. They serve as the foundation for the architectural design process, guiding the development of technical solutions to meet specific organizational goals. According to VMware's architectural methodology and standard IT frameworks (e.g., TOGAF, which aligns with VMware's design principles), business requirements focus onwhatthe organization aims to accomplish rather thanhowit will be accomplished orwhowill be involved. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A: Business requirements define which audience needs to be involved.This statement is incorrect.
Identifying the audience or stakeholders (e.g., end users, IT staff, ormanagement) is part of stakeholder analysis or requirements gathering, not the purpose of business requirements themselves. Business requirements focus on the goals and objectives of the organization, not the specific people involved in the process. This option misaligns with the role of business requirements in VCF design.
Option B: Business requirements define how the goals and objectives can be achieved.This statement is incorrect. Thehowaspect-detailing the methods, technologies, or processes to achieve goals-falls under the purview offunctional requirementsortechnical design specifications, not business requirements. For example, in VCF 5.2, deciding to use vSAN for storage or NSX for networking is a technical decision, not a business requirement. Business requirements remain agnostic to implementation details, making this option invalid.
Option C: Business requirements define which goals and objectives can be achieved.This statement is misleading. Business requirements do not determinewhichgoals are achievable (implying a feasibility assessment); rather, they statewhatthe organization intends or needs to achieve. Assessing feasibility comes later in the design process (e.g., during risk analysis or solution validation). In VCF, business requirements might specify the need for high availability or scalability, but they don't evaluate whether those are possible- that's a technical consideration. Thus, this option is incorrect.
Option D: Business requirements define what goals and objectives need to be achieved.This is the correct answer. Business requirements articulatewhatthe organization seeks to accomplish with the solution, such as improving application performance, ensuring disaster recovery, or supporting a specific number of workloads.
In the context of VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2, examples might include "the solution must support 500 virtual machines" or "the environment must provide 99.99% uptime." These statements define the goals and objectives without specifying how they will be met (e.g., via vSphere HA or vSAN) or who will implement them. This aligns with VMware's design methodology, where business requirements drive the creation of subsequent functional and non-functional requirements.
In VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2, the architectural design process begins with capturing business requirements to ensure the solution aligns with organizational needs. The VMware Cloud Foundation Planning and Preparation Guide emphasizes that business requirements establish the "what" (e.g., desired outcomes like cost reduction or workload consolidation), which then informs the technical architecture, such as the sizing of VI Workload Domains or the deployment of management components.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Requirements Gathering) VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Design Methodology Overview) VMware Validated Design Documentation (Business Requirements Definition, applicable to VCF 5.2 principles)
NEW QUESTION # 72
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud solution for a customer that will include two physical locations. The customer has stated the following requirement:
All management tooling must be resilient at the component level within a single site.
When considering the design decisions for VMware Aria Suite components, what should the Architect document to meet the stated requirement?
- A. The solution will configure the VCF Workload domain in a stretched topology across two locations.
- B. The solution will deploy three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered configuration.
- C. The solution will implement an external load balancer for Aria Operations Cloud Proxies.
- D. The solution will deploy Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager in a high availability configuration.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The requirement specifies that management tooling must be resilient at the component level within a single site, meaning each site's management components (e.g., VMware Aria Suite) must withstand individual failures without relying on the other site. Let's evaluate each option in the context of VCF 5.2 and Aria Suite:
Option A: The solution will implement an external load balancer for Aria Operations Cloud Proxies Aria Operations Cloud Proxies collect data for monitoring and don't inherently require an external load balancer for resiliency within a site. TheVMware Aria Operations Administration Guideindicates that proxies are lightweight and typically deployed per cluster, with resiliency achieved via multiple proxies, not load balancing. This doesn't directly address component-level resiliency for the broader Aria Suite management tools.
Option B: The solution will configure the VCF Workload domain in a stretched topology across two locationsA stretched topology extends a workload domain across two sites for site-level resiliency (e.g., disaster recovery), not component-level resiliency within a single site. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidenotes that stretched clusters rely on cross-site failover, which contradicts the requirement for single-site resilience, making this irrelevant to management tooling within one site.
Option C: The solution will deploy three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered configuration VMware Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) supports a clustered deployment with three appliances (primary, replica, and failover) to ensure high availability within a site. TheVMware Aria Automation Installation Guideconfirms that this configuration provides component-level resiliency by allowing the cluster to tolerate individual appliance failures without service disruption. In VCF, Aria Automation is a key management tool, and this design meets the requirement for single-site resilience.
Option D: The solution will deploy Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager in a high availability configuration Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager (LCM) manages the lifecycle of Aria components but isn't deployed in a clustered HA configuration itself in VCF 5.2-it's a single appliance with backup/restore options. TheVCF
5.2 Administration Guidenotes that LCM resiliency is typically achieved via infrastructure HA (e.g., vSphere HA), not native clustering, making this less directly aligned with component-level resiliency compared to Aria Automation clustering.
Conclusion:Option C best meets the requirement by ensuring Aria Automation, a critical management tool, is resilient at the component level within a single site through clustering, aligning with VCF and Aria Suite best practices.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Management Component Design.
VMware Aria Automation Installation Guide(docs.vmware.com): Clustered Configuration for HA.
VMware Aria Suite Lifecycle Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): LCM Deployment Options.
NEW QUESTION # 73
When configuring VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF), which component must be installed before vSAN?
Response:
- A. NSX
- B. Aria Operations
- C. vSphere
- D. SDDC Manager
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 74
Which two actions can be performed to troubleshoot VMware Cloud Foundation's NSX issues?
(Choose two)
Response:
- A. Verify network segmentation in the NSX interface
- B. Use the NSX troubleshooting tool to analyze logs
- C. Restart the NSX Manager service
- D. Reconfigure the vSphere DRS settings
Answer: A,B
NEW QUESTION # 75
An architect is collaborating with a client to design a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) solution requiredfor a highly secure infrastructure project that must remain isolated from all other virtual infrastructures. The client has already acquired six high-density vSAN-ready nodes, and there is no budget to add additional nodes throughout the expected lifespan of this project. Assuming capacity is appropriately sized, which VCF architecture model and topology should the architect suggest?
- A. Multiple Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model
- B. Single Instance Consolidated architecture model
- C. Single Instance - Multiple Availability Zone Standard architecture model
- D. Single Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model
Answer: D
Explanation:
VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 offers various architecture models (Consolidated, Standard) and topologies (Single/Multiple Instance, Single/Multiple Availability Zones) to meet different requirements. The client's needs-high security, isolation, six vSAN-ready nodes, and no additional budget-guide the architect' s choice. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A: Single Instance - Multiple Availability Zone Standard architecture model This model uses a single VCF instance with separate Management and VI Workload Domains across multiple availability zones (AZs) for resilience. It requires at least four nodes per AZ (minimum for vSAN HA), meaning six nodes are insufficient for two AZs (eight nodes minimum). It also increases complexity and doesn't inherently enhance isolation from other infrastructures. This option is impractical given the node constraint.
Option B: Single Instance Consolidated architecture model
The Consolidated model runs management and workload components on a single cluster (minimum four nodes, up to eight typically). With six nodes, this is feasible and capacity-efficient, but it compromises isolation because management and user workloads share the same infrastructure. For a "highly secure" and
"isolated" project, mixing workloads increases the attack surface and risks compliance, making this less suitable despite fitting the node count.
Option C: Single Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model This is the correct answer. The Standard model separates management (minimum four nodes) and VI Workload Domains (minimum three nodes, but often four for HA) within a single VCF instance and AZ.
With six nodes, the architect can allocate four to the Management Domain and two to a VI Workload Domain (or adjust based on capacity). A single AZ fits the budget constraint (no extra nodes), and isolation is achieved by dedicating the VCF instance to this project, separate from other infrastructures. The high-density vSAN nodes support both domains, and security is enhanced by logical separation of management and workloads, aligning with VCF 5.2 best practices for secure deployments.
Option D: Multiple Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model Multiple VCF instances (e.g., one for management, one for workloads) in a single AZ require separate node pools, each with a minimum of four nodes for vSAN. Six nodes cannot support two instances (eight nodes minimum), making this option unfeasible given the budget and hardware constraints.
Conclusion:TheSingle Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model(Option C) is the best fit. It uses six nodes efficiently (e.g., four for Management, two for Workload), ensures isolation by dedicating the instance to the project, and meets security needs through logical separation, all within the budget limitation.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Architecture Models and Topologies) VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Sizing and Isolation Considerations)
NEW QUESTION # 76
An architect decided to deploy an NSX Edge cluster using SDDC Manager. These Edges will be used by a Tier-0 Gateway configured with BGP to provide North-South connectivity in the Management Domain.
Which statement justifies this design decision?
- A. Extra Large form factor is available only when edges are deployed using SDDC Manager.
- B. NSX Edges deployed via SDDC Manager can be updated separately in the future.
- C. VPN service in NSX will be available and configurable via SDDC Manager with NSX Edges deployed using this method.
- D. This deployment method will automatically configure dynamic routing.
Answer: C
Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2, NSX Edge clusters provide critical networking services, such as North- South connectivity via Tier-0 Gateways, often using BGP for dynamic routing. Deploying NSX Edges via SDDC Manager integrates them into the VCF lifecycle management framework, which impacts their configuration and operational capabilities. Let's analyze each option:
Option A: NSX Edges deployed via SDDC Manager can be updated separately in the futureIn VCF, SDDC Manager manages the lifecycle (deployment, upgrades, etc.) of NSX components, including Edge nodes. However, updates are not performed "separately" from the VCF stack; they are part of a coordinated upgrade process across the management domain. TheVCF 5.2 Administration Guidenotes that Edge updates are tied to NSX Manager and SDDC Manager workflows, contradicting the idea of independent updates. This doesn't justify the design decision.
Option B: VPN service in NSX will be available and configurable via SDDC Manager with NSX Edges deployed using this methodWhen NSX Edges are deployed via SDDC Manager in the Management Domain, they are fully integrated into the VCF architecture. This enables advanced NSX features, such as VPN services (L2VPN, IPsec VPN), to be configured and managed through SDDC Manager or NSX Manager UIs. TheVMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guideconfirms that deploying Edges via SDDC Manager supports North-South connectivity (e.g., via Tier-0 with BGP) and additional services like VPN, providing operational flexibility. This justifies the decision by aligning with VCF's integrated management capabilities.
Option C: Extra Large form factor is available only when edges are deployed using SDDC Manager NSX Edge form factors (Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large) are determined by resource requirements and deployment method, but the Extra Large form factor is available whether Edges are deployed manually via NSX Manager or through SDDC Manager in VCF. TheNSX-T Data Center Installation Guide(part of VMware docs) clarifies that form factor selection is independent of the deployment tool, making this statement inaccurate and not a justification.
Option D: This deployment method will automatically configure dynamic routingDeploying Edges via SDDC Manager automates some aspects of setup (e.g., cluster creation, basicnetworking), but dynamic routing (e.g., BGP) requires manual configuration of peers, ASNs, and route maps via NSX Manager. The VCF 5.2 Networking Guidestates that while SDDC Manager streamlines deployment, BGP configuration remains a post-deployment task, disproving "automatic" configuration as a justification.
Conclusion:Option B is the correct justification because deploying NSX Edges via SDDC Manager ensures integration with VCF's management plane, enabling features like VPN services alongside BGP-based North- South connectivity in the Management Domain. This aligns with the architect's goal of leveraging VCF's centralized management strengths.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guide(docs.vmware.com): Section on NSX Edge Deployment and Tier-0 Gateway Configuration.
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): SDDC Manager Workflows for NSX Edge Clusters.
NSX-T Data Center Installation Guide(docs.vmware.com): Edge Node Deployment Options.
NEW QUESTION # 77
What is the primary purpose of a logical design for VMware Cloud Foundation?
Response:
- A. To specify the backup and disaster recovery strategies
- B. To provide a detailed blueprint for the network, storage, and compute resources
- C. To configure the virtual machines and workloads
- D. To determine the physical hardware and network components
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 78
Given a scenario, which two considerations should be factored into the capacity management design for VMware Cloud Foundation?
(Choose two)
Response:
- A. Sizing the vSAN storage to meet the performance needs of the workloads
- B. Allocating resources to ensure that compute, storage, and network are balanced
- C. Ensuring sufficient network bandwidth for VM migrations across regions
- D. Determining the appropriate number of management clusters for workload isolation
Answer: A,B
NEW QUESTION # 79
When determining the compute capacity for a VMware Cloud Foundation VI Workload Domain, which three elements should be considered when calculating usable resources? (Choose three.)
- A. Number of 10GbE NICs per VM
- B. Disk capacity per VM
- C. VM swap file
- D. CPU/Cores per VM
- E. vSAN space efficiency feature enablement
- F. Number of VMs
Answer: C,D,E
Explanation:
When determining the compute capacity for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) VI Workload Domain, the goal is to calculate the usable resources available to support virtual machines (VMs) and their workloads. This involves evaluating the physical compute resources (CPU, memory, storage) and accounting for overheads, efficiency features, and configurations that impact resource availability. Below, each option is analyzed in the context of VCF 5.2, with a focus on official documentation and architectural considerations:
A: vSAN space efficiency feature enablementThis is a critical element to consider. VMware Cloud Foundation often uses vSAN as the primary storage for VI Workload Domains. vSAN offers space efficiency features such as deduplication, compression, and erasure coding (RAID-5/6). When enabled, these features reduce the physical storage capacity required for VM data, directly impacting the usable storage resources available for compute workloads. For example, deduplication and compression can significantly increase usable capacity by eliminating redundant data, while erasure coding trades off some capacity for fault tolerance. The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation documentation emphasizes the need to account for vSAN policies and efficiency features when sizing storage, as they influence the effective capacity available for VMs. Thus, this is a key factor in compute capacity planning.
B: VM swap fileThe VM swap file is an essential consideration for compute capacity, particularly for memory resources. In VMware vSphere (a core component of VCF), each powered-on VM requires a swap file equal to thesize of its configured memory minus any memory reservation. This swap file is stored on the datastore (often vSAN in VCF) and consumes storage capacity. When calculating usable resources, you must account for this overhead, as it reduces the available storage for other VM data (e.g., virtual disks).
Additionally, if memory overcommitment is used, the swap file size can significantly impact capacity planning. The VMware Cloud Foundation Design Guide and vSphere documentation highlight the importance of factoring in VM swap file overhead when determining resource availability, making this a valid element to consider.
C: Disk capacity per VMWhile disk capacity per VM is important for storage sizing, it is not directly a primary factor in calculatingusable compute resourcesfor a VI Workload Domain in the context of this question. Disk capacity per VM is a workload-specific requirement that contributes to overall storage demand, but it does not inherently determine the usable CPU or memory resources of the domain. In VCF, storage capacity is typically managed by vSAN or other supported storage solutions, and while it must be sufficient to accommodate all VMs, it is a secondary consideration compared to CPU, memory, and efficiency features when focusing on compute capacity. Official documentation, such as the VCF 5.2 Administration Guide, separates storage sizing from compute resource planning, so this is not one of the top three elements here.
D: Number of 10GbE NICs per VMThe number of 10GbE NICs per VM relates to networking configuration rather than compute capacity (CPU and memory resources). While networking is crucial for VM performance and connectivity in a VI Workload Domain, it does not directly influence the calculation of usable compute resources like CPU cores or memory. In VCF 5.2, networking design (e.g., NSX or vSphere networking) ensures sufficient bandwidth and NICs at the host level, but per-VM NIC counts are a design detail rather than a capacity determinant. The VMware Cloud Foundation Design Guide focuses NIC considerations on host-level design, not VM-level compute capacity, so this is not a relevant element here.
E: CPU/Cores per VMThis is a fundamental element in compute capacity planning. The number of CPU cores assigned to each VM directly affects how many VMs can be supported by the physical CPU resources in the VI Workload Domain. In VCF, compute capacity is based on the total number of physical CPU cores across all ESXi hosts, with a minimum of 16 cores per CPU required for licensing (as per the VCF 5.2 Release Notes and licensing documentation). When calculating usable resources, you must consider how many cores are allocated per VM, factoring in overcommitment ratios and workload demands. The VCF Planning and Preparation Workbook explicitly includes CPU/core allocation as a key input for sizing compute resources, making this a critical factor.
F: Number of VMsWhile the total number of VMs is a key input for overall capacity planning, it is not a direct element in calculatingusable compute resources. Instead, it is a derived outcome based on the available CPU, memory, and storage resources after accounting for overheads and per-VM allocations. The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 documentation (e.g., Capacity Planning for Management and Workload Domains) uses the number of VMs as a planning target, not a determinant of usable capacity. Thus, it is not one of the top three elements for this specific calculation.
Conclusion:The three elements that should be considered when calculating usable compute resources are vSAN space efficiency feature enablement (A),VM swap file (B), andCPU/Cores per VM (E). These directly impact the effective CPU, memory, and storage resources available for VMs in a VI Workload Domain.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Workbook
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Release Notes
VMware vSphere 8.0 Update 3 Documentation (for VM swap file and CPU allocation details) VMware Cloud Foundation Administration Guide
NEW QUESTION # 80
The following requirements were identified in an architecture workshop for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) design project utilizing vSAN for its primary storage solution:
REQ001: Application must maintain a minimum of 1,000 transactions per second (TPS) during business hours excluding disaster recovery (DR) scenarios.
REQ002: Automatic DRS and HA must be utilized.
REQ003: Planned maintenance must be executed outside of business hours.
Which of the following test scenarios should be added and performed to validate these requirements?
- A. Trigger a vSAN disk group evacuation.
- B. Trigger a failure of an ESXi host.
- C. Trigger a Virtual Machine vMotion operation.
- D. Trigger a vCenter Server update.
Answer: B
Explanation:
To validate the stated requirements, the test scenario must address all three: application performance (1,000 TPS), automatic DRS and HA functionality, and maintenance timing (implying minimal disruption during business hours). In a VCF environment with vSAN, test scenarios should simulate real-world conditions that challenge these requirements. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A: Trigger a Virtual Machine vMotion operationvMotion tests DRS's ability to migrate VMs for load balancing, which aligns with REQ002's "automatic DRS" mandate. It can be scheduled outside business hours (REQ003) to minimize impact. However, it doesn't fully test HA (automatic failover) or ensure 1,000 TPS (REQ001) under failure conditions, as vMotion is a planned operation, not a failure scenario. This is a partial match but not comprehensive.
Option B: Trigger a vCenter Server updateUpdating vCenter tests management plane resilience but doesn' t directly validate application performance (REQ001), DRS/HA automation (REQ002), or vSAN-specific behavior. While it could relate to maintenance (REQ003), it's unrelated to workload or storage functionality in the VCF design, making it irrelevant here.
Option C: Trigger a vSAN disk group evacuationEvacuating a vSAN disk group simulates maintenance (REQ003) by moving data to other nodes, testing vSAN's resilience. It may involve DRS for VM migration (REQ002), but it doesn't trigger HA failover. While it could indirectly affect TPS (REQ001), the requirement excludes DR scenarios, and this test doesn't guarantee performance validation during business hours under normal operations or host failure.
Option D: Trigger a failure of an ESXi hostSimulating an ESXi host failure directly tests REQ002: HA automatically restarts VMs on other hosts, and DRS balances the load post-failure. In a vSAN environment, it also validates data availability (vSAN rebuilds objects), ensuring 1,000 TPS (REQ001) is maintained during business hours under failure conditions (excluding DR, as this is a single-host failure within a site). While not a maintenance task (REQ003), it implicitly ensures maintenance-like disruptions (e.g., host failure) don't violate performance, aligning with VCF's HA/DRS automation goals. TheVCF 5.2 Administration Guide recommends host failure testing to validate HA and vSAN resilience.
Conclusion:Option D comprehensively validates REQ001 (TPS under failure), REQ002 (automatic DRS and HA), and indirectly supports REQ003 by ensuring business-hour performance during unplanned events, making it the best test scenario.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): vSAN and HA/DRS Testing Scenarios.
vSphere Availability Guide(docs.vmware.com): HA Failover Testing.
vSAN Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): Disk Group Evacuation and Failure Scenarios.
NEW QUESTION # 81
A design requirement has been specified for a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) instance. All managed workload resources must be lifecycle managed with the following criteria:
* Development resources must be automatically reclaimed after two weeks
* Production resources will be reviewed yearly for reclamation
* Resources identified for reclamation must allow time for review and possible extension What capability will satisfy the requirements?
- A. Aria Automation Project Membership
- B. Aria Operations Rightsizing Recommendations
- C. Aria Suite Lifecycle Content Management
- D. Aria Automation Lease Policy
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 82
In the context of VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF), which design decision ensures business continuity for mission-critical workloads?
Response:
- A. Implementing stretch clusters between data centers for availability
- B. Utilizing a local storage solution for performance optimization
- C. Configuring vSphere HA for automatic restart of virtual machines
- D. Using a single management domain to centralize control
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 83
An architect is preparing a VI Workload Domain design with a dedicated NSX instance. The workload domain is planned to grow up to 300 ESXi hosts within the next six months. Which is the minimum NSX Manager form factor that should be recommended by the architect for this VI Workload Domain to support the forecasted growth?
- A. Medium
- B. Large
- C. Extra Small
- D. Small
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 84
Which two business objectives are essential for gathering requirements in a VMware Cloud Foundation deployment?
(Choose two)
Response:
- A. Determining the total cost of ownership (TCO)
- B. Minimizing the environmental footprint
- C. Ensuring compliance with industry regulations
- D. Maximizing the use of on-premises resources
Answer: A,C
NEW QUESTION # 85
Which design decision should be prioritized when creating a VMware Cloud Foundation logical design for a network infrastructure?
Response:
- A. The logical segmentation of networks and VLANs
- B. The exact placement of storage devices
- C. The physical layout of servers and switches
- D. The specific models of firewalls and load balancers
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 86
......
Use Free 2V0-13.24 Exam Questions that Stimulates Actual EXAM : https://www.premiumvcedump.com/VMware/valid-2V0-13.24-premium-vce-exam-dumps.html
Get 100% Real 2V0-13.24 Free Online Practice Test: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RvyUGw6ECoCNEPAmRiRjmJn79zWSryt2